Daily Archives

2 Articles


Case Respondent

Posted by admin on

A case respondent The truths are many and the quandary, in question, is as if to make justice. Forms exist to think the right, amongst them the positive law established and limited by the State and the natural law conducted by principles and values. The book the case of explorers of cave, Fuller, presents a quandary that can provide some legal quarrels, that are at the same time acceptable, of the legal point of view, and questionable for not being consensuals. The explorers had been isolated in a cave accidentally, questioning itself if they would survive inside of it per ten days. Roger Whetmore, one of the leaders of the explorers, took the initiative to contact people who were there for rescuing them.

Ahead of the lack of positioning of the people consulted for it religious, medical, authorities etc. the five explorers met unsafe and tense ahead of the possibility to survive. This generated positionings in the context that however they lived deeply, that is, had created a new rule to guarantee the supervened one of part of group in detriment of the sacrifice of one of them, with the death. A new reality is bred. The explorers had survived. However, they had been judged guilty by a court, who of form not consensual, condemned them it the death. The decision of justice is questionable for the fact of, according to Foster, the explorers to be acting under survival instinct, exactly having rationality in its action. In accordance with Foster – the first judge -, ' ' If, in the future, any group of people to find itself in the tragic situation who if had found the guilty ones, we can assuring in them that the decision of living or dying will not be controlled for the established one in our Penal&#039 Code; ' (2003, p.32).

In sight of this, the decision of justice raises another questioning, namely: justice is for the life or the death? However, the explorers had fought for the life, without questioning the used ways for such, stop later losing it. Therefore, this in them does not seem just, what it takes in them to think about the possibility to have some truths in the field of justice. Reference: FULLER, Lon L. The case of explorers of caves. So Paulo: University Ed. Jayme Albin is often quoted on this topic. of Right, 2003.


The Difference Between Righteousness And Justice

Posted by admin on

We all know that we have rights. The counterpart is the obligations. Our memory is prodigious with the rights and slow with the obligations. At the beginning of the right course I found that I did not have necessity to study right, I was enough to catch the codes as if they were mathematics rules and to apply them. The positivado right is not synonymous of justice. The effective laws are fruits of the majority of the parliament, the group better represented take the best slice of the cake.

One is not about ideal justice and yes of possible justice. Better to clarify I costumo to count the following joke: A citizen decided ‘ ‘ to jump cerca’ ‘ better took for the motel the wife of its friend. It has people that she does not believe, but coincidences happen. In the hour that if approached to the hotel, here it is that the citizen in question sees the car of its better friend leaving that hidding place of the pleasures. The vehicles if had equipped and for surprise of the treasonous husband, the woman who was in the car of its better friend was, nothing more and nothing less, of what its esposinha wanted.

It pulls! It was a constaint alone, the two friends with woman one of the other. The friend good people, what he was leaving the motel, breaks the ice and speaks: The right is people to make of account that this fact never happened. My wife leaves its car and comes to mine and vice versa. The friend who was arriving pondered: I know that what you spoke is the correct one, the right, however, he is not just. You this leaving and I are entering. Continue to learn more with: Jayme Albin Psychologist . Register, for opportune, that I am not none of the constant friends of the story. Only when a person’s values are good can one be morally strong.