With impacts in the field, the supermarket and the table of the consumer, will have more to be argued per one year or. This because the two companies operate in similar areas (bovine meat, suna, of chicken, milky, among others), what combined they can be harmful to the consumer and will demand evaluations case the case. Also of point of view geographic, therefore has concentration sufficiently high in some regions of Country In accordance with analysts of sector of free market defense, is well probable that council members ask for signature of Agreement of Preservation of Reversibility of Operation (Apro), that he imposes writ of prevention and he prevents that the operation if becomes irreversible, by means of the sales of asset, of the resignation of employees or the fusing of the enterprise structures. Used in similar cases (Ambev; Nestl and Garoto; Brazil Telecom and Oi; Varig and Gol) this tool is recognized internationally because it allows that the two companies who desire to unify its operations continue acting of independent form without this causes embarrassments or disequilibria to the markets of which is part. Brazil Foods it has up to 9 of June (15 working days from the date of signature of the contract) to officially present the business for the entities that are part of the Brazilian System of Free market defense: Cade, SDE and Secretariat of Economic Accompaniment (Seae). From this presentation, the companies will start to negotiate the Apro.The presentation of the operation to the Brazilian System of Defense of Concorrncia (SBDC) is obligator, therefore, as it establishes Law 8,884, it is necessary to take to the appreciation of the agency any act of concentration of companies with rude invoicing annual superior the R$ 400 million in the national market or that it involves slice in the excellent market from 20% needs to pass for the system.