Of beginning already a basic interrogation is figured concernente to the act of conception of the thought, in particular, the scientific one. It is asked: ' ' because the knowledge if presents creative as inaudito, beyond the restricted possibility of the simple logical deduction, producing itself then as given newness, stops beyond the possible shirt of force dialectic that happens in the modality of the method in its logical universality which functionally imprisons the concept in the axiomatic skeleton? ' ' or, alternatively, ' ' which the type of epistemologia that ahead grants to the creative act sovereignty of of the one of the conclusive ones reached only for that pure logicidade? ' ' It is from Kant who the judgment – epistemologicamente constructive – to concer nente to science is defined in its generality, universality and character of apodictical type, namely, ' ' transcendental' '. Distinct of the analytical judgments which nothing adds to the knowledge – with the predicate I only unlace shout from the citizen – and the judgments synthetic a posteriori – that they are in the total dependence of the vivencivel experience – the solitary of Keningsberg defines general, universal and apodictical the synthetic judgments a priori one which correspond to science (and tam- well to possible metaphysics) as and ocorren of as a epistmica essence that assures the growth or acrs top of a mountain of the knowledge associating subject to the o preached in a linking to the first unknown sight and not categorically deductible for logic. The thesis to defend here attributes to the intrinsic and constituent college of criati vidade the attribution of the synthetic judgments a priori. Boom creative could be mentioned analogicalally to the same fantastic report of onrico type, in which or- logical-deductible ganizao does not present greater importance but profu is of the representation and of the conceitualidade they arise in the construction of proces only cognoscitivo, in the possibly universal teorizao.