Ambassadors of the twenty-three countries of the EU reaction was swift. Instructions agreed upon beforehand, they marched to not hear anything more than one ‘hate speech’, and described as them the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, in an official statement. The gesture was jaleado with applause and shouts by a large group of Jews who shouted “shame” and “stop racism”. We, like the rest of ambassadors, have followed the slogan of the (Czech) Presidency of the Union, which was that at the time that we were listening to opinions not acceptable for Europe abandonariamos the room. The Iranian President has spoken of a racist State (in reference to Israel) and why we went,”explained the Spanish representative to the UN, Javier Garrigues. The diplomat clarified, however, that the gesture does not mean that the Union is leaving the Conference, unless there is a really serious matter. The EU, with the exception of the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Poland, decided to participate in the meeting under the condition not to accept any abuse, among others, qualify as racist Israel on Sunday night.

He is said that the words of Ahmadinejad were not the only uncomfortable moment of the opening day of the meeting which aims to overcome the controversy of the first UN Conference on racism that was held in 2001 in Durban South Africa, when the representatives of Israel and United States were angry after the Arab countries tacharan the Jewish nation from ‘Racist State’. There was a no less noisy preamble. The gesture of the Europeans has been received with applause and shouts by a large group of Jews who shouted shame and stop racism. The activists were kept out of the room, but still screams could be heard from the outside. Adds the elcorreodigital.com, boycott, especially of EE UU, does not sit well with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Ban Ki-Moon, who He also said that he thought talking to Ahmadinejad.

In general terms, a strategy is a set of planned actions whose conception and implementation pursue a particular purpose in specific terms to business strategy, according to Norton and Irving (1999) La strategy is what we do, what we want to make our Organization and towards where we want to ir. Bruce and Langdon (2000) extend this concept by adding the interrogative adverb: () and como is widely known that the elaboration of strategies are based on diagnostic companies produced with support of the use of different tools for self-analysis and consideration of the external environment such as the SWOT matrix, the PESTLE Studio, the identification of core competencies, modeling of Porter’s 5 forces, among others. One might then think that all companies whose corporate models are composed of variables with identical value, where its internal particularities with regard to weaknesses and strengths are equivalent, and that they operate in the same market and low the same conditions of competition as changes in the external environment affect each and every one of them equivalently-; they would react similarly before any change that experience your environment regardless of their dimension or depth. Under these conclusions is wouldn’t be illogical to make strategic proposals conceived in the womb of each of their boards of directors were also synonyms between if and therefore also constant and predictable. According to this hypothesis the key of the success probably stems in the speed and efficiency with which each could deploy as planned according to the immediacy required given a change of situation specific. This hypothesis is incorrect. Organizations are complex systems similar to living organisms, with personality, soul and spirit. Fingerprints which leave printed by history and the chain of desoxirribonucleicos acids that comprise it are unique to each one. There are no two alike, and therefore, their responses to the environmental stimuli, even under conditions identical, are also uneven.