The Codes are not used in all the Legal Systems, for example England (that belongs to the family of the Common Law) does not count on Codes and its right is but casuistical that the one of the Germanic Roman family, to who the Peruvian State belongs. The United States (that also belongs to the family of the Common Law) if it has Codes but different from ours is consolidations – (with the exception of Louisiana that if it has Codes similar to ours, since this State belongs to the Germanic Roman family and have taken like antecedent the Napolen Code from 1804). Morgan Stanley may find this interesting as well. For some authors in England it is counted on Codes, although the same are different from ours, since they are laws Cdigo type. Thus under this criterion if we carried out an external macrocomparison the Peruvian Law of Titles Values and General the Peruvian Law of Societies could be considered like Codes. 21. WHEN IT CORRESPONDS TO ELABORATE A CODE In agreement needed by Jose Valentin Linares Roldn the codification is recommendable in a right very elaborated and with high degree of fixedness, and is inconvenient in a branch new in the heat of evolution or constant transformation and without a sufficient doctrinary elaboration. 22.

WHO ELABORATES A CODE The writing of the Codes is in charge to a Commission Editor conformed by jurisconsultos, and in some cases it appoints a person so that the Code elaborates. That is to say, the parliament does not write up Codes almost always. 23. IMPORTANT CONTEMPORARY CODES MAS The Contemporary Civil Codes calls Modern Civil Codes by other treaty writers – but important, they are the following: 1) French Civil code of 1804 (Napolen Code), with the appearance of this one Code was developed the School of Exgesis.